| ชื่อเรื่อง | : | “‘God(s)’ as a Comparative Category” |
| นักวิจัย | : | Engler, Steven , Gardiner, Mark Q. |
| คำค้น | : | God , Meaning , Holism |
| หน่วยงาน | : | Mount Royal University ,Canada |
| ผู้ร่วมงาน | : | - |
| ปีพิมพ์ | : | 2556 |
| อ้างอิง | : | Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. “‘God(s)’ as a Comparative Category.” DIN – Tidsskrift for religion og kultur 2013/1 (2013): 120-132. , 1501-9934 , http://hdl.handle.net/11205/356 |
| ที่มา | : | - |
| ความเชี่ยวชาญ | : | - |
| ความสัมพันธ์ | : | - |
| ขอบเขตของเนื้อหา | : | - |
| บทคัดย่อ/คำอธิบาย | : | In this paper we argue that, despite the fact that the term ‘god’ may be used effectively as a comparative concept in the study of religion within narrowly circumscribed contexts, the risks of doing so as a broad cross-cultural category outweigh any possible benefits. We advance an account of the kind of meaning that complex concepts, like ‘god’, have. This account guarantees a risk that certain further concepts that are associated with ‘god’ in some cultural contexts will be illicitly transferred to its use in others. The centrality of ‘god’ in western and Christian contexts makes this risk particularly acute, to the point of not being worth the trouble. |
| บรรณานุกรม | : |
Engler, Steven , Gardiner, Mark Q. . (2556). “‘God(s)’ as a Comparative Category”.
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Mount Royal University ,Canada. Engler, Steven , Gardiner, Mark Q. . 2556. "“‘God(s)’ as a Comparative Category”".
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Mount Royal University ,Canada. Engler, Steven , Gardiner, Mark Q. . "“‘God(s)’ as a Comparative Category”."
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Mount Royal University ,Canada, 2556. Print. Engler, Steven , Gardiner, Mark Q. . “‘God(s)’ as a Comparative Category”. กรุงเทพมหานคร : Mount Royal University ,Canada; 2556.
|
