ridm@nrct.go.th   ระบบคลังข้อมูลงานวิจัยไทย   รายการโปรดที่คุณเลือกไว้

Refactoring proofs

หน่วยงาน Edinburgh Research Archive, United Kingdom

รายละเอียด

ชื่อเรื่อง : Refactoring proofs
นักวิจัย : Whiteside, Iain Johnston
คำค้น : refactoring , Hiscript , formal semantics , proof trees
หน่วยงาน : Edinburgh Research Archive, United Kingdom
ผู้ร่วมงาน : Dixon, Lucas , Grov, Gudmund , Aspinall, David , Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
ปีพิมพ์ : 2556
อ้างอิง : http://hdl.handle.net/1842/7970
ที่มา : -
ความเชี่ยวชาญ : -
ความสัมพันธ์ : Whiteside, I., Aspinall, D., Dixon, L., and Grov, G. (2011). Towards formal proof script refactoring. In Davenport, J. H., Farmer, W. M., Urban, J., and Rabe, F., editors, Calculemus/MKM, volume 6824 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 260–275. Springer. , Whiteside, I., Aspinall, D., and Grov, G. (2012). An essence of SSReflect. In Jeuring et al. (2012), pages 186–201.
ขอบเขตของเนื้อหา : -
บทคัดย่อ/คำอธิบาย :

Refactoring is an important Software Engineering technique for improving the structure of a program after it has been written. Refactorings improve the maintainability, readability, and design of a program without affecting its external behaviour. In analogy, this thesis introduces proof refactoring to make structured, semantics preserving changes to the proof documents constructed by interactive theorem provers as part of a formal proof development. In order to formally study proof refactoring, the first part of this thesis constructs a proof language framework, Hiscript. The Hiscript framework consists of a procedural tactic language, a declarative proof language, and a modular theory language. Each level of this framework is equipped with a formal semantics based on a hierarchical notion of proof trees. Furthermore, this framework is generic as it does not prescribe an underlying logical kernel. This part contributes an investigation of semantics for formal proof documents, which is proved to construct valid proofs. Moreover, in analogy with type-checking, static well-formedness checks of proof documents are separated from evaluation of the proof. Furthermore, a subset of the SSReflect language for Coq, called eSSence, is also encoded using hierarchical proofs. Both Hiscript and eSSence are shown to have language elements with a natural hierarchical representation. In the second part, proof refactoring is put on a formal footing with a definition using the Hiscript framework. Over thirty refactorings are formally specified and proved to preserve the semantics in a precise way for the Hiscript language, including traditional structural refactorings, such as rename item, and proof specific refactorings such as backwards proof to forwards proof and declarative to procedural. Finally, a concrete, generic refactoring framework, called Polar, is introduced. Polar is based on graph rewriting and has been implemented with over ten refactorings and for two proof languages, including Hiscript. Finally, the third part concludes with some wishes for the future.

บรรณานุกรม :
Whiteside, Iain Johnston . (2556). Refactoring proofs.
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Edinburgh Research Archive, United Kingdom .
Whiteside, Iain Johnston . 2556. "Refactoring proofs".
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Edinburgh Research Archive, United Kingdom .
Whiteside, Iain Johnston . "Refactoring proofs."
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Edinburgh Research Archive, United Kingdom , 2556. Print.
Whiteside, Iain Johnston . Refactoring proofs. กรุงเทพมหานคร : Edinburgh Research Archive, United Kingdom ; 2556.