ridm@nrct.go.th   ระบบคลังข้อมูลงานวิจัยไทย   รายการโปรดที่คุณเลือกไว้

The downside of relying on research outputs to assess business faculty performance comments from down under regarding "facilitating and creating synergies between teaching and research : the role of the academic administrator" /

หน่วยงาน Central Queensland University, Australia

รายละเอียด

ชื่อเรื่อง : The downside of relying on research outputs to assess business faculty performance comments from down under regarding "facilitating and creating synergies between teaching and research : the role of the academic administrator" /
นักวิจัย : Chapman, R. L. (Ross L.)
คำค้น : LIBRARY OF CONGRESS NEEDED , Pure basic research. , 930401 Management and Leadership of Schools/Institutions. , 150312 Organisational Planning and Management. , Business schools -- Faculty performance measurement -- Research performance -- Journal rankings -- Balance -- Administrator -- Commentary , Journal Article. Refereed, Scholarly Journal
หน่วยงาน : Central Queensland University, Australia
ผู้ร่วมงาน : -
ปีพิมพ์ : 2555
อ้างอิง : http://hdl.cqu.edu.au/10018/1020071
ที่มา : Chapman, RL 2012, 'The Downside of Relying on Research Outputs to Assess Business Faculty Performance: Comments From Down Under Regarding "Facilitating and Creating Synergies Between Teaching and Research: The Role of the Academic Administrator"', Journal of Management Education, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 495-502, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1052562912447073
ความเชี่ยวชาญ : -
ความสัมพันธ์ : Journal of management education. United States : Sage Publications, Inc., 2012. Vol. 36, no. 4 (2012), p. 495-502 8 pages Refereed 1052-5629 1552-6658 (online) , ACQUIRE [electronic resource] : Central Queensland University Institutional Repository.
ขอบเขตของเนื้อหา : -
บทคัดย่อ/คำอธิบาย :

This commentary presents an Australian perspective on Balkin and Mello’s “Facilitating and Creating Synergies between Teaching and Research: The Role of the Academic Administrator.” It addresses one particularly important aspect of the separation of teaching and research in business schools; namely, the increasing dominance of discipline-based research output measures in overall business faculty performance, coupled with a reliance on journal rankings as de facto quality measures for research output. Some possible alternate approaches to research performance/impact measurement in our rapidly changing academic environment are also considered.

บรรณานุกรม :
Chapman, R. L. (Ross L.) . (2555). The downside of relying on research outputs to assess business faculty performance comments from down under regarding "facilitating and creating synergies between teaching and research : the role of the academic administrator" /.
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia.
Chapman, R. L. (Ross L.) . 2555. "The downside of relying on research outputs to assess business faculty performance comments from down under regarding "facilitating and creating synergies between teaching and research : the role of the academic administrator" /".
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia.
Chapman, R. L. (Ross L.) . "The downside of relying on research outputs to assess business faculty performance comments from down under regarding "facilitating and creating synergies between teaching and research : the role of the academic administrator" /."
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia, 2555. Print.
Chapman, R. L. (Ross L.) . The downside of relying on research outputs to assess business faculty performance comments from down under regarding "facilitating and creating synergies between teaching and research : the role of the academic administrator" /. กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia; 2555.