| ชื่อเรื่อง | : | Sustainability, decision making and culture in organisations |
| นักวิจัย | : | Boulle, Mark. , Robinson, David. |
| คำค้น | : | Decision making. , Business enterprises , Social responsibility of business. , Management. , TBA. , 970115 Expanding Knowledge in Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services. , 150106 Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. , 150399 Business and Management not elsewhere classified. , Sustainability -- Strong sustainability -- Decision making -- Accounting -- Chief executive officer -- Values journey -- Organisational culture |
| หน่วยงาน | : | Central Queensland University, Australia |
| ผู้ร่วมงาน | : | - |
| ปีพิมพ์ | : | 2555 |
| อ้างอิง | : | http://hdl.cqu.edu.au/10018/927173 |
| ที่มา | : | Boulle, M & Robinson, D 2012, 'Sustainability, decision making and culture in organisations' paper presented to the Association for Sustainability in Business 2012 Conference: Taking Care of Business: Sustainable Transformation, Gold Coast, Qld, 21st - 22nd May, http://sustainabilitybusiness.com.au/PP/Mark%20Boulle.pdf |
| ความเชี่ยวชาญ | : | - |
| ความสัมพันธ์ | : | Taking care of business : sustainable transformation, Gold Coast, Qld, 21-22 May 2012. [s.l.] : [s.n.], 2012. p. 1-32 32 pages Refereed , ACQUIRE [electronic resource] : Central Queensland University Institutional Repository. |
| ขอบเขตของเนื้อหา | : | - |
| บทคัดย่อ/คำอธิบาย | : | This paper conducts a review of recent literature in sustainability and identifies three levels of sustainability: non-sustainability, weak sustainability and strong sustainability. An analysis was conducted on the responses of top CEOs to questions in a survey conducted by a leading Australian newspaper to gain an insight into the areas of concern forefront in their minds. Evidence was sought for CEO attention to financial, growth, sustainability, environmental and social issues. The responses of 56 CEOs from leading Australian companies as per market capitalisation were analysed for key words, derivatives of, including sustainability, environmental concern, resource concern, innovation, growth, long-term, social concern, employee/recruitment, global concern, financial, technology, government policy/regulation, competition, managerial/cost control, image/marketing. The number of times these keys areas were mentioned was collated as indicative of being forefront in the decision makers’ mind. As hypothesised, financial considerations received the most mentioned responses. The findings also confirmed the importance of including a long-term focus in any definition of sustainability. Key to the direction an organisation takes and its position on sustainability, are the decisions made by senior management and influential chief executive officers in particular. It is argued an excessive fixation on the accumulation of company profits by management can lead to an unsustainable course for organisations and the broader community. The challenge for companies is to meet two strategic objectives: maintaining a sustainable future for the entity, and maintaining a responsible approach to sustainable development in areas impacted by the firm. |
| บรรณานุกรม | : |
Boulle, Mark. , Robinson, David. . (2555). Sustainability, decision making and culture in organisations.
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia. Boulle, Mark. , Robinson, David. . 2555. "Sustainability, decision making and culture in organisations".
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia. Boulle, Mark. , Robinson, David. . "Sustainability, decision making and culture in organisations."
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia, 2555. Print. Boulle, Mark. , Robinson, David. . Sustainability, decision making and culture in organisations. กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia; 2555.
|
