This paper undertakes a content analysis of newspaper articles from Australia, the UK and the US concerned with a variety of issues relevant to sustainable food and agriculture during the period 1999 to 2002. It then goes on to identify the various ways in which sustainability, organic food and agriculture, genetic engineering, genetically modified foods and food safety are framed both in their own terms and in relation to each other. It finds that despite the many competing approaches to sustainability found in scientific and agricultural production discourses, media discourses tend to reduce this complexity to a straightforward conflict between organic and conventional foods. Despite regular reporting of viewpoints highly critical of organic food and agriculture, this binary opposition produces discourses in which organic foods are seen as more-or-less synonymous with safety, naturalness and nutrition, and their alternatives as artificial, threatening and untrustworthy. Particularly controversial food-related issues such as genetic engineering, food scares, chemical residues, regulatory failure and so on are thus treated as essentially part of the same problematic to which organic food offers a trustworthy and easily understood alternative.