The purpose of this research were to study opinions of the graduates concerningcurriculum and instruction of art education program, faculty of education, prince ofsongkla university. The populations used in this research were 134 graduates from arteducation program, continuing curriculum 2 years since 2534-2539. The researchinstrument constructed by the researcher was a questionnaire composed of checklists,rating scales, and open ended questions. The data were analyzed by means and standarddeviation. The finding of this research were as follows: 1. Opinion concerning curriculum: 1.1 The purpose of curriculum : The graduates agreed at a high level,except for the purpose of art educator which were agreed at a moderate level. 1.2 The structure of curriculum: The graduates agreed that 89 credits wereenough, except Sculpture for Art Education Instructor, Art for Secondary Educationand Painting for Art Education instructor which were found to be not enough. 1.3 The content of curriculum: The graduates agreed with the content at ahigh level, except the curriculum for graduates needs and modem curriculum, whichwere at a moderate level. 2. Opinion concerning instruction : 2.1 The preparing for teaching of instruction: The graduates agreed at ahigh level. 2.2 The teaching method of instruction. The graduates agreed at almost thehigh level. All the rest were agreed at a high level, except teacher who used onlyone teaching method in curriculum which were agreed at almost a low level. 2.3 The activity for instruction: The graduates agreed on activities at ahigh level, except for lecturers from outside university which were at a moderatelevel. 2.4 The media for instruction: The graduates agreed on media at a moderatelevel, except for papers, books and literatures, and media for workshop which were ata high level. 2.5 The evaluation of instruction: The graduates agreed with evaluation ofinstruction at a high level. 3. Opinion concerning the using of knowledge: The graduates agreed with theuses of knowledge at a high level.