| ชื่อเรื่อง | : | Memory Complaint Questionnaire performed poorly as screening tool: validation against psychometric tests and affective measures |
| นักวิจัย | : | Reid, Meagan. , , Parkinson, Lynne. , , Gibson, Richard. , , Schofield, Peter. , , D'Este, Catherine. , , Attia, John. , , Tavener, Meredith. , , Byles, Julie. , |
| คำค้น | : | Memory Disorders; Validation Studies; Affect; Executive Function; Psychomotor Performance; Memory |
| หน่วยงาน | : | Central Queensland University, Australia |
| ผู้ร่วมงาน | : | - |
| ปีพิมพ์ | : | 2555 |
| อ้างอิง | : | http://hdl.cqu.edu.au/10018/1017293 , acquire1-20140327-121647 , cqu:10827 |
| ที่มา | : | - |
| ความเชี่ยวชาญ | : | - |
| ความสัมพันธ์ | : | - |
| ขอบเขตของเนื้อหา | : | - |
| บทคัดย่อ/คำอธิบาย | : | Objective: This study examined the internal and external validity of the Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q), a brief measure of subjective memory complaint in people with normal cognitive function. Study Design and Setting: The Study of Health Outcomes in Aircraft Maintenance Personnel was a retrospective cohort study investigating the association between aircraft fuel tank deseal/reseal activities and health status in Royal Australian Air Force personnel. Crosssectional comparison tests included measures of executive functioning, psychomotor speed, attention/working memory, newlearning/memory, depression, and anxiety. An adjusted regression analysis accounted for confounders including age, dates of posting, rank, education, alcohol use, tobacco use, and affective status. Results: Eight hundred seventy-nine participants completed the MAC-Q. Although the MAC-Q tested as highly reliable and internally valid, it was highly associated with affective status and was only associated with Digit Symbol Coding after adjustment for depression/anxiety. Conclusion: The MAC-Q is greatly influenced by affective status but not memory performance. It is probably not useful as a specific screen of memory complaint for general population research. |
| บรรณานุกรม | : |
Reid, Meagan. , , Parkinson, Lynne. , , Gibson, Richard. , , Schofield, Peter. , , D'Este, Catherine. , , Attia, John. , , Tavener, Meredith. , , Byles, Julie. , . (2555). Memory Complaint Questionnaire performed poorly as screening tool: validation against psychometric tests and affective measures.
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia. Reid, Meagan. , , Parkinson, Lynne. , , Gibson, Richard. , , Schofield, Peter. , , D'Este, Catherine. , , Attia, John. , , Tavener, Meredith. , , Byles, Julie. , . 2555. "Memory Complaint Questionnaire performed poorly as screening tool: validation against psychometric tests and affective measures".
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia. Reid, Meagan. , , Parkinson, Lynne. , , Gibson, Richard. , , Schofield, Peter. , , D'Este, Catherine. , , Attia, John. , , Tavener, Meredith. , , Byles, Julie. , . "Memory Complaint Questionnaire performed poorly as screening tool: validation against psychometric tests and affective measures."
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia, 2555. Print. Reid, Meagan. , , Parkinson, Lynne. , , Gibson, Richard. , , Schofield, Peter. , , D'Este, Catherine. , , Attia, John. , , Tavener, Meredith. , , Byles, Julie. , . Memory Complaint Questionnaire performed poorly as screening tool: validation against psychometric tests and affective measures. กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia; 2555.
|
