| ชื่อเรื่อง | : | Socio-economic differences in public opinion regarding water fluoridation in Queensland |
| นักวิจัย | : | Mummery, W. Kerry. , Duncan, Mitchell. , Kift, Ryan. |
| คำค้น | : | Healthy Communities , 730301 Health education and promotion , 730218 Social structure and health , 730213 Preventive medicine , 321216 Health Promotion , 321299 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified , 321214 Health and Community Services , 321206 Preventive Medicine , Water quality , Fluoridation. , Public opinion , Fluoride -- Attitudes -- Prevention |
| หน่วยงาน | : | Central Queensland University, Australia |
| ผู้ร่วมงาน | : | - |
| ปีพิมพ์ | : | 2550 |
| อ้างอิง | : | http://hdl.cqu.edu.au/10018/12355 , http://acquire.cqu.edu.au:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/cqu:2666 , cqu:2666 |
| ที่มา | : | Mummery, W K, Duncan, M & Kift, R 2007, 'Socio-economic differences in public opinion regarding water fluoridation in Queensland', Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol.31, no.4, pp. 336-339. |
| ความเชี่ยวชาญ | : | - |
| ความสัมพันธ์ | : | Australian and New Zealand journal of public health : Sydney. : Blackwell Publishing, 2007. Vol. 31, no. 4 (August 2007), p. 336-339 4 pages Refereed 1326-0200 1753-6405 (online) , aCQUIRe [electronic resource] : Central Queensland University Institutional Repository. |
| ขอบเขตของเนื้อหา | : | - |
| บทคัดย่อ/คำอธิบาย | : | Objective: To describe public opinion relating to the fluoridation of drinking water in a sample of the Queensland population. Method: Data were collected by means of a computer-assisted telephone interview survey from a sample of the Queensland population. Descriptive statistics and logistical regression were used to examine associations between variables. Results: Seventy per cent of the total sample supported water fluoridation of their local supply. More than 71% of the total sample agreed that water fluoridation was safe. People living in areas of higher socio-economic / relative socio-economic advantage were more likely to support the addition of fluoride to local drinking water and agree that it was safe. Opinions about fluoridation varied by respondent age and gender. Conclusions: General support was found in this sample of the Queensland population for fluoridation of drinking water. Implications: In Queensland, fluoridationof the water supply is now a political decision. Information about public opinion on fluoridation may assist decision makers in the final determination. |
| บรรณานุกรม | : |
Mummery, W. Kerry. , Duncan, Mitchell. , Kift, Ryan. . (2550). Socio-economic differences in public opinion regarding water fluoridation in Queensland.
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia. Mummery, W. Kerry. , Duncan, Mitchell. , Kift, Ryan. . 2550. "Socio-economic differences in public opinion regarding water fluoridation in Queensland".
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia. Mummery, W. Kerry. , Duncan, Mitchell. , Kift, Ryan. . "Socio-economic differences in public opinion regarding water fluoridation in Queensland."
กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia, 2550. Print. Mummery, W. Kerry. , Duncan, Mitchell. , Kift, Ryan. . Socio-economic differences in public opinion regarding water fluoridation in Queensland. กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia; 2550.
|
