According to legislation rules, regional regulation has a unique position ssince though regional regulation is placed under The Act yet there is no unity of opinion among the experts on the subject of the person who actually has the power to examine. Debate upon the validity of executive review and judicial review toward regional regulation becomes nowadays question in the era of area that has autonomy regarding the regional regulation is the product of District Head and Assembly at Provincial Level (DPRD) in an autonomous district. As stated in The Act Number 32 in 2004, principle of autonomous district applied is autonomy principle, which is as widespread as possible, that is, the district is given authority to manage all governmental things excepts those which become government responsibility as it is stated on The Act. Districts have authority to make their own policy to give service, role improvement, initiative, and make an efficient society aiming to improve society’s welfare. The research is commited by normative law method. The main data are secondary data. The data are collected by library research and field research. The secondary data are analyzed by qualitative analysis. Dualism of the annulment regional regulation arrangement occurs in Indonesia which is done by the government as administrative institution and a trial done by Supreme Court. The dualism is visible in Article 145 subsection 2 and 5 Act Number 32 in 2004 concerning District Government. That Acts differentiate the authority of regional regulation trial in a different subsection. Consequently, the regional regulation is called off temporarily because of the law of regional regulation trial commited by Supreme Court, namely if one regional regulation is contradicted with legislation rules hence Supreme Court grants the request and ask District Government and Assembly at Provincial Level (DPRD) to abrogate the regional regulation maximum of 90 days. The judicial review can not be submitted to the decision of calling off the regional regulation made by Supreme Court. As a suggestion, law instrument used to call off the regional regulation is not sufficient only by applying the decision of Minister of Domestic Affair since the qualifications and mechanism of regional regulation annulment must refer to The Act Number 32 in 2004. The annulment suppose to be committed by President with Presidential Regulation. Subsequently, as a suggestion, the time limit of the process of regional regulation trial should be obviously managed in Supreme Court regulation so that the regional regulation which is being examined will not be pending in the district because of a long time trial.

09E01990