ridm@nrct.go.th   ระบบคลังข้อมูลงานวิจัยไทย   รายการโปรดที่คุณเลือกไว้

What should we teach? defining your discipline to drive curriculum renewal: an environmental engineering case study

หน่วยงาน Central Queensland University, Australia

รายละเอียด

ชื่อเรื่อง : What should we teach? defining your discipline to drive curriculum renewal: an environmental engineering case study
นักวิจัย : Dowling, DG , , Hadgraft, R. G. ,
คำค้น : Graduate Capabilities; Engineering Curriculum; Stakeholder Consultation; Curriculum Design, Environmental Engineering
หน่วยงาน : Central Queensland University, Australia
ผู้ร่วมงาน : -
ปีพิมพ์ : 2555
อ้างอิง : http://hdl.cqu.edu.au/10018/1017754 , acquire1-20140401-111449 , cqu:10883
ที่มา : -
ความเชี่ยวชาญ : -
ความสัมพันธ์ : -
ขอบเขตของเนื้อหา : -
บทคัดย่อ/คำอธิบาย :

In Australia, the federal government, employers, and accrediting bodies, such as Engineers Australia, are calling for more clearly defined program outcomes or exit standards for engineering programs [1-3]. Engineering Schools are therefore under increasing pressure to more clearly define what graduates from four or five year engineering programs should know and be able to do. This paper describes a simple, but elegant stakeholder process that can be used to define the capabilities of a graduate who could claim in-depth technical competence in their discipline. The Defining Your Discipline (DYD) Process [4] may be used by educational institutions and industry organisations to develop practitioner-authenticated sets of graduate capabilities for their discipline. During 2010 and 2011, the DYD team worked with the members of Engineers Australia’s Environmental College to produce a set of graduate capabilities for environmental engineering programs. This work resulted in the publication of a Guide [5] that defines the profession’s expectations of the capabilities of graduates during their first two or three years of practice. These graduate capabilities are described, including the Environmental Engineering Capability Cube, a somewhat unexpected result.

บรรณานุกรม :
Dowling, DG , , Hadgraft, R. G. , . (2555). What should we teach? defining your discipline to drive curriculum renewal: an environmental engineering case study.
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia.
Dowling, DG , , Hadgraft, R. G. , . 2555. "What should we teach? defining your discipline to drive curriculum renewal: an environmental engineering case study".
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia.
Dowling, DG , , Hadgraft, R. G. , . "What should we teach? defining your discipline to drive curriculum renewal: an environmental engineering case study."
    กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia, 2555. Print.
Dowling, DG , , Hadgraft, R. G. , . What should we teach? defining your discipline to drive curriculum renewal: an environmental engineering case study. กรุงเทพมหานคร : Central Queensland University, Australia; 2555.